Skip to main content

Compare aircraft models

Up to three models side by side. Everything here is true of every aircraft of the type, not of any one aircraft.

Choose models

The picker searches 839 models.

  • CESSNA 182P

Comparison

AttributeCESSNA 182P
What it is
Seats4
Landing geartricycle
Engines1
EngineContinental O-470-R/S
Horsepower230 hp
Fuel100LL
Certification basisCAR3
Production start1972
Production end1976
Endorsements requiredhigh-performance
Performance
Cruise speed143 KTAS
Range650 nm
Service ceiling17,700 ft
Climb rate890 ft/min
Stall speed (Vso)49 KCAS
Takeoff over 50 ft1,350 ft
Landing over 50 ft1,350 ft
Load and fuel
Seats4
Useful load1,280 lb
Full-fuel payload914 lb
Max takeoff weight2,950 lb
Empty weight1,670 lb
Usable fuel61 gal
Fuel burn at cruise12.9 gal/h
Cost of ownership
Price, low$105,000
Price, high$340,000
Prices as of2026
Engine TBO1,500 h
Overhaul cost, low$40,000
Overhaul cost, high$55,000
The fleet and its record
Registered, all time3,451
Active fleet2,099
Median year built1974.0
NTSB events, last 10 years64
Fatal events, last 10 years6
Events per 1,000 active, last 10 years130.49
Personal-flying events per 1,000 active225.25
Ownership transfers, last 24 months418
Transfers per 100 active319.91
Airworthiness directives9
Directives, last 5 years0
Rate confidenceok
Peer scores
Peer classFixed wing single-engine, piston, 1 engine, 3-4 seats
Accident record46.1 of 10
Severity55.6 of 10
Access64.7 of 10
Support79.7 of 10
Liquidity85.4 of 10
Overall (sum of the categories shown)931.5 out of 50
  1. Events per 1,000 active, last 10 years: per 1,000 active aircraft · base 2,099 active.
  2. Personal-flying events per 1,000 active: per 1,000 active aircraft · base 2,099 active.
  3. Transfers per 100 active: per 100 active aircraft · base 2,099 active.
  4. Accident record: class median 28.36 · 202 models in class.
  5. Severity: class median 11.65.
  6. Access: class median 767.75.
  7. Support: class median 141.5.
  8. Liquidity: class median 19.57.
  9. Each of the five categories places the model within its peer class, from 0 (the worst of the class) to 10 (the best): a position among comparable models, not a grade. The overall score is the sum of the categories shown that are scored, out of 10 for each (50 when all five are); it is given only when at least 4 of the five are scored, and it can be set against another model's only when both are in the same peer class and scored on the same categories.