Skip to main content

Compare aircraft models

Up to three models side by side. Everything here is true of every aircraft of the type, not of any one aircraft.

Choose models

The picker searches 839 models.

  • CESSNA 310C

Comparison

AttributeCESSNA 310C
What it is
Seats5
Landing geartricycle
Engines2
EngineContinental O-470-M
Horsepower260 hp
Fuel100LL
Certification basisCAR3
Production start1959
Production end1959
Endorsements requiredcomplex;high-performance;multi-engine
Performance
Cruise speed180 KTAS
Range800 nm
Service ceiling20,000 ft
Climb rate1,660 ft/min
Stall speed (Vso)66 KCAS
Takeoff over 50 ft1,600 ft
Landing over 50 ft1,700 ft
Load and fuel
Seats5
Useful load1,930 lb
Full-fuel payload1,318 lb
Max takeoff weight4,830 lb
Empty weight2,900 lb
Usable fuel102 gal
Fuel burn at cruise29.1 gal/h
Cost of ownership
Price, low$60,000
Price, high$160,000
Prices as of2026
Engine TBO1,500 h
Overhaul cost, low$40,000
Overhaul cost, high$55,000
The fleet and its record
Registered, all time256
Active fleet58
Median year built1959.0
NTSB events, last 10 years0
Fatal events, last 10 years0
Events per 1,000 active, last 10 years10 · thin base (low)
Personal-flying events per 1,000 active20 · thin base (low)
Ownership transfers, last 24 months20
Transfers per 100 active334.48 · thin base (low)
Airworthiness directives5
Directives, last 5 years0
Rate confidencelow
Peer scores
Peer classFixed wing multi-engine, piston, 2 engines, 5-6 seats
Accident record4—
Severity5—
Access6—
Support75.1 of 10
Liquidity89.8 of 10
Overall (sum of the categories shown)9—
  1. Events per 1,000 active, last 10 years: per 1,000 active aircraft · base 58 active.
  2. Personal-flying events per 1,000 active: per 1,000 active aircraft · base 58 active.
  3. Transfers per 100 active: per 100 active aircraft · base 58 active.
  4. Accident record: class median 28.74 · 56 models in class.
  5. Severity: class median 33.33.
  6. Access: class median 2,812.25.
  7. Support: class median 57.
  8. Liquidity: class median 21.91.
  9. Each of the five categories places the model within its peer class, from 0 (the worst of the class) to 10 (the best): a position among comparable models, not a grade. The overall score is the sum of the categories shown that are scored, out of 10 for each (50 when all five are); it is given only when at least 4 of the five are scored, and it can be set against another model's only when both are in the same peer class and scored on the same categories.