Skip to main content

Aircraft model

CESSNA 180

Everything here is true of every aircraft of the type, not of any one aircraft.

The Skywagon, in production from 1953 to 1981, and the aeroplane that defined the American backcountry and bush market. It is a tailwheel four-seater with a six-cylinder Continental, a constant-speed propeller and a structure built to be loaded and landed on gravel. Bush operators, float operators, ranchers and Alaskan pilots have used them for seventy years and still do, which is why they cost more now than they did new in real terms. The suffix letter tells you what you are getting. The plain 180 of 1953 to 1956 has 225 hp and a 2,550 lb gross weight; the 230 hp O-470-K arrived in 1956 and the 180A of 1957 raised gross weight to 2,650 lb. The 180E of 1962 brought larger 65-gallon tanks with an 84-gallon option. The big change is the 180G of 1964, which took the longer fuselage, wings and gear of the 185, added a rear window and seats for six, and went to 2,800 lb — everything from then on is the roomier six-place aeroplane. The 180J of 1973 has the cambered-leading-edge wing, and the 180K of 1977 the O-470-U engine and a strengthened tailwheel. The Skywagon name itself only dates from 1969.

This is a capable aeroplane and a demanding one. It climbs well over 1,000 fpm, cruises at 143 knots and carries a real load, but it is a taildragger with substantial power and it will punish a sloppy landing — insurance companies require meaningful tailwheel time and usually dual in type before they will cover a new owner. Running costs are higher than a 172's in every category: more fuel, a more expensive engine and propeller, and a market in which every airworthy example is fought over. Check the spar carry-through, the gear box and the tailcone for damage history, because a lot of these aeroplanes have worked hard. Float and skis versions, and gross-weight-increase STCs, are common.

Compare with…

Put CESSNA 180 side by side with up to two other models.

  • CESSNA 180

Open CESSNA 180 in Compare

What it is

Seats4
Landing geartaildragger
Engines1
EngineContinental O-470-A
Horsepower225 hp
Fuel100LL
Certification basisCAR3
Production start1953
Production end1981
Endorsements requiredhigh-performance;tailwheel

Performance

Cruise speed143 KTAS
Range600 nm
Service ceiling19,600 ft
Climb rate1,150 ft/min
Stall speed (Vso)48 KCAS
Takeoff over 50 ft1,205 ft
Landing over 50 ft1,365 ft

Load and fuel

Seats4
Useful load1,025 lb
Full-fuel payload695 lb
Max takeoff weight2,550 lb
Empty weight1,525 lb
Usable fuel55 gal
Fuel burn at cruise12.6 gal/h

Cost of ownership

Price, low$105,000
Price, high$345,000
Prices as of2026
Engine TBO1,500 h
Overhaul cost, low$40,000
Overhaul cost, high$55,000

The fleet and its record

Registered, all time2,575
Active fleet1,178
Median year built1955.0
NTSB events, last 10 years67
Fatal events, last 10 years3
Events per 1,000 active, last 10 years56.881
Personal-flying events per 1,000 active52.632
Ownership transfers, last 24 months161
Transfers per 100 active13.673
Airworthiness directives9
Directives, last 5 years0
Rate confidenceok
  1. Events per 1,000 active, last 10 years: per 1,000 active aircraft · base 1,178 active.
  2. Personal-flying events per 1,000 active: per 1,000 active aircraft · base 1,178 active.
  3. Transfers per 100 active: per 100 active aircraft · base 1,178 active.

Peer scores6

Peer classFixed wing single-engine, piston, 1 engine, 3-4 seats
Accident record1.9 of 101
Severity7.6 of 102
Access2.1 of 103
Support9.1 of 104
Liquidity1.1 of 105
Overall (sum of the categories shown)21.8 out of 506

These record scores treat CESSNA 180 as one design with the same aircraft registered under other names: it includes 2 aircraft registered under REARWIN. Prices are not combined.

  1. Accident record: class median 32.28 · 202 models in class.
  2. Severity: class median 12.5.
  3. Access: class median 775.
  4. Support: class median 147.5.
  5. Liquidity: class median 19.9.
  6. Each of the five categories places the model within its peer class, from 0 (the worst of the class) to 10 (the best): a position among comparable models, not a grade. The overall score is the sum of the categories shown that are scored, out of 10 for each (50 when all five are); it is given only when at least 4 of the five are scored, and it can be set against another model's only when both are in the same peer class and scored on the same categories.