Skip to main content

Aircraft model

CESSNA 310F

Everything here is true of every aircraft of the type, not of any one aircraft.

The 1961 310, and the first one most people would recognise as the modern shape: swept fin, a pointed nose with more room in it, and an extra pair of cabin windows. Underneath, the important change had already happened two years earlier — fuel injection. The 260 hp Continental IO-470-D replaced the carburetted O-470 and took cruise from about 178 to about 191 knots on roughly the same fuel. 155 were built. Maximum takeoff weight is 4,830 lb.

This is where the early 310 becomes a genuinely useful aeroplane rather than a handsome one, and prices reflect it. The injected Continental is more efficient and less prone to carburettor ice but harder to start hot, which catches out pilots coming from carburetted engines. Everything else is the familiar bargain: two engines and a retractable gear for the price of a tired single, with the running costs of neither. The tip-tank fuel system still has to be managed actively and is still the thing that most often turns a 310 flight into an accident report.

Compare with…

Put CESSNA 310F side by side with up to two other models.

  • CESSNA 310F

Open CESSNA 310F in Compare

What it is

Seats5
Landing geartricycle
Engines2
EngineContinental IO-470-D
Horsepower260 hp
Fuel100LL
Certification basisCAR3
Production start1961
Production end1961
Endorsements requiredcomplex;high-performance;multi-engine

Performance

Cruise speed191 KTAS
Range678 nm
Service ceiling21,300 ft
Climb rate1,800 ft/min
Stall speed (Vso)73 KCAS
Takeoff over 50 ft1,395 ft
Landing over 50 ft1,720 ft

Load and fuel

Seats5
Useful load1,781 lb
Full-fuel payload1,169 lb
Max takeoff weight4,830 lb
Empty weight3,049 lb
Usable fuel102 gal
Fuel burn at cruise29.1 gal/h

Cost of ownership

Price, low$60,000
Price, high$245,000
Prices as of2026
Engine TBO1,500 h
Overhaul cost, low$42,000
Overhaul cost, high$58,000

The fleet and its record

Registered, all time153
Active fleet41
Median year built1961.0
NTSB events, last 10 years2
Fatal events, last 10 years2
Events per 1,000 active, last 10 years48.78 · thin base (low)1
Personal-flying events per 1,000 active0 · thin base (low)2
Ownership transfers, last 24 months5
Transfers per 100 active12.2 · thin base (low)3
Airworthiness directives5
Directives, last 5 years0
Rate confidencelow
  1. Events per 1,000 active, last 10 years: per 1,000 active aircraft · base 41 active.
  2. Personal-flying events per 1,000 active: per 1,000 active aircraft · base 41 active.
  3. Transfers per 100 active: per 100 active aircraft · base 41 active.

Peer scores6

Peer classFixed wing multi-engine, piston, 2 engines, 5-6 seats
Accident record—1
Severity—2
Access8.9 of 103
Support2.8 of 104
Liquidity0.7 of 105
  1. Accident record: class median 28.74 · 56 models in class.
  2. Severity: class median 33.33.
  3. Access: class median 2,812.25.
  4. Support: class median 57.
  5. Liquidity: class median 21.91.
  6. Each of the five categories places the model within its peer class, from 0 (the worst of the class) to 10 (the best): a position among comparable models, not a grade. The overall score is the sum of the categories shown that are scored, out of 10 for each (50 when all five are); it is given only when at least 4 of the five are scored, and it can be set against another model's only when both are in the same peer class and scored on the same categories.
© 2026 TailFax. All rights reserved.TailFax · public FAA and NTSB records; not an inspection