Skip to main content

Aircraft model

PIPER PA-22

Everything here is true of every aircraft of the type, not of any one aircraft.

The original Tri-Pacer, from the start of the run in the early 1950s with the 125 hp Lycoming. Piper took the tailwheel Pacer, bolted a nosewheel on the front and sold enormous numbers to people who wanted four seats for less than a Cessna cost. It is short, tall and slightly odd-looking, and with only 125 hp it is the slowest and least capable of the family.

The overriding question on any Tri-Pacer is the fabric. The airframe is steel tube covered in fabric and a recover job costs more than most of these aeroplanes are worth, so establish the covering's age, type and condition before anything else, and inspect the tube structure underneath for corrosion at the same time. The aeroplane itself is quirky: many have interconnected aileron and rudder controls, it sits high and feels tippy on the ground, and the short wing means a steep descent with the power off. With 125 hp and four people aboard it is genuinely underpowered. Many have been converted back to tailwheel configuration, which changes the endorsement requirement and usually the price.

Compare with…

Put PIPER PA-22 side by side with up to two other models.

  • PIPER PA-22

Open PIPER PA-22 in Compare

What it is

Seats4
Landing geartricycle
Engines1
EngineLycoming O-290-D
Horsepower125 hp
Fuel100LL
Certification basisCAR3
Production start1951
Production end1953
Endorsements required—

Performance

Cruise speed100 KTAS
Range420 nm
Service ceiling15,000 ft
Climb rate620 ft/min
Stall speed (Vso)43 KCAS
Takeoff over 50 ft1,600 ft
Landing over 50 ft1,280 ft

Load and fuel

Seats4
Useful load820 lb
Full-fuel payload604 lb
Max takeoff weight1,800 lb
Empty weight980 lb
Usable fuel36 gal
Fuel burn at cruise7 gal/h

Cost of ownership

Price, low$30,000
Price, high$65,000
Prices as of2026
Engine TBO1,800 h
Overhaul cost, low$26,000
Overhaul cost, high$36,000

The fleet and its record

Registered, all time1,142
Active fleet277
Median year built1953.0
NTSB events, last 10 years11
Fatal events, last 10 years0
Events per 1,000 active, last 10 years39.711
Personal-flying events per 1,000 active39.712
Ownership transfers, last 24 months45
Transfers per 100 active16.253
Airworthiness directives1
Directives, last 5 years0
Rate confidenceok
  1. Events per 1,000 active, last 10 years: per 1,000 active aircraft · base 277 active.
  2. Personal-flying events per 1,000 active: per 1,000 active aircraft · base 277 active.
  3. Transfers per 100 active: per 100 active aircraft · base 277 active.

Peer scores6

Peer classFixed wing single-engine, piston, 1 engine, 3-4 seats
Accident record3.3 of 101
Severity8.4 of 102
Access7 of 103
Support6.5 of 104
Liquidity2.1 of 105
Overall (sum of the categories shown)27.3 out of 506
  1. Accident record: class median 28.36 · 202 models in class.
  2. Severity: class median 11.65.
  3. Access: class median 767.75.
  4. Support: class median 141.5.
  5. Liquidity: class median 19.57.
  6. Each of the five categories places the model within its peer class, from 0 (the worst of the class) to 10 (the best): a position among comparable models, not a grade. The overall score is the sum of the categories shown that are scored, out of 10 for each (50 when all five are); it is given only when at least 4 of the five are scored, and it can be set against another model's only when both are in the same peer class and scored on the same categories.