Skip to main content

RLU Breezy RLU-1

These figures describe a typical build. Each aircraft of this design was built by its owner, and the one you are looking at may differ.

The Breezy is the open-frame pusher designed by Carl Unger, Charles Roloff and Robert Liposky in 1964: a welded steel-tube truss with the pilot and two passengers sitting in the open ahead of the wing, a borrowed Piper wing of about 33 ft span and a Continental or small Lycoming behind, with Sport Aviation's figures of 90 hp and 120 nm on 10 gallons; about a thousand have been built from plans.

There is no other aeroplane like it to own and almost nothing published to describe it: no weights or speeds were found in this research, so the aircraft's own paperwork is the only source, and because every Breezy uses a different donor wing and a different engine, the weight-and-balance is the aircraft's alone. It is a 60-knot ride-giving machine with a 10-gallon tank, flown from an exposed seat with no cockpit, so weather, noise and the condition of the structure the pilot sits on are the realities; weld quality and the wing-attach and gear fittings are the inspection. Insurance can be difficult for a three-seat open pusher. The owner may maintain it and the condition inspection needs an A&P or the repairman certificate; plans are still available and the Breezy community is small and close.

Variants of the RLU-1 Breezy

  • Breezy RLU-1 · 1964 · 76 active · this page

Also consider

Compare these side by side

TAILFAX SCORE

6.7out of 40

Among 3–4 seat pistons (223 models)

Accident record1.3
Severity1.4
Access—
Support3.5
Liquidity0.5

How the score works · Peer scores below

Compare with…

Put RLU Breezy RLU-1 side by side with up to three other models.

  • RLU Breezy RLU-1

Open RLU Breezy RLU-1 in Compare

Watch this model

One email a day if anything changes: new ADs and NTSB records.

What it is

Seats3
Landing geartricycle
Engines—
EngineContinental C-90 (90 hp; O-200 to O-320 fitted)
Horsepower90 hp
Fuel—
Certification basisamateur-built
Production start1964
Production end—
Endorsements required—

Performance

Cruise (75 % power)—
Range (75 %, standard fuel, 30-min reserve)120 nm
Service ceiling—
Climb rate—
Stall speed (Vso)—
Takeoff over 50 ft—
Landing over 50 ft—

Load and fuel

Seats3
Useful load—
Full-fuel payload—
Max takeoff weight—
Empty weight—
Usable fuel—
Fuel burn at cruise—

Cost of ownership

Price, low—
Price, high—
Prices as of—
Engine TBO—
Overhaul cost, low—
Overhaul cost, high—

The fleet and its record

Registered, all time152
Active fleet76
Median year built1979
NTSB events, last 10 years0
Fatal events, last 10 years0
Events per 1,000 active, last 10 years0 · thin base (low)1
Personal-flying events per 1,000 active0 · thin base (low)2
Ownership transfers, last 24 months9
Transfers per 100 active11.84 · thin base (low)3
Airworthiness directives2
Directives, last 5 years0
Rate confidencelow
  1. Events per 1,000 active, last 10 years: per 1,000 active aircraft · base 76 active.
  2. Personal-flying events per 1,000 active: per 1,000 active aircraft · base 76 active.
  3. Transfers per 100 active: per 100 active aircraft · base 76 active.

Peer scores6

Peer classFixed wing single-engine, piston, 1 engine, 3-4 seats
Accident record1.3 of 10 · scored on 21 years of events (fewer than 10 in the last 10)1
Severity1.4 of 10 · scored on 21 years of events (fewer than 10 in the last 10)2
Access—3
Support3.5 of 104
Liquidity0.5 of 105
Overall (sum of the categories shown)6.7 out of 406
  1. Accident record: class median 33.21 · 223 models in class.
  2. Severity: class median 12.5.
  3. Access: class median 796.
  4. Support: class median 131.
  5. Liquidity: class median 19.89.
  6. Each of the five categories places the model within its peer class, from 0 (the worst of the class) to 10 (the best): a position among comparable models, not a grade. The overall score is the sum of the categories shown that are scored, out of 10 for each (50 when all five are); it is given only when at least 4 of the five are scored, and it can be set against another model's only when both are in the same peer class and scored on the same categories. When accident record and severity cannot be scored because the model has too few records, the other three give a partial score out of 30, labelled as such; it is never set against a full score.

Data as of: FAA registry Sep 28 · NTSB Oct 2 · ADs Oct 8 · scores Sep 30

© 2026 TailFax. All rights reserved.TailFax · public FAA and NTSB records; not an inspection