Compare aircraft models
Up to four models side by side. Each column describes the type, not any one aircraft.
Choose models
The picker searches 1,021 models.
- Seawind 3000
- Cessna 182T
- Cessna 180A
- Sling HW
Comparison
4 models side by side: scroll sideways to see them all. The attribute names stay on the left.
| Seawind 3000These figures describe a typical build. Each aircraft of this design was built by its owner, and the one you are looking at may differ. | Cessna 182T | Cessna 180A | Sling HWThese figures describe a typical build. Each aircraft of this design was built by its owner, and the one you are looking at may differ. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| What it is | ||||
| Seats | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Landing gear | amphibious | tricycle | taildragger | tricycle |
| Engines | — | 1 | 1 | — |
| Engine | Continental IO-550-N (310 hp) | Lycoming IO-540-AB1A5 | Continental O-470-K | Rotax 916 iS (160 hp; 915 iS 141 hp on earlier kits) |
| Horsepower | 310 hp | 230 hp | 230 hp | 160 hp |
| Fuel | — | 100LL | 100LL | — |
| Certification basis | amateur-built | CAR3 | CAR3 | amateur-built |
| Production start | — | 2001 | 1957 | 2020 |
| Production end | — | current | 1957 | — |
| Endorsements required | — | high-performance | high-performance;tailwheel | — |
| Performance | ||||
| Cruise (75 % power) | 147 KTAS | 145 KTAS | 143 KTAS | 145 KTAS |
| Range (75 %, standard fuel, 30-min reserve) | 905 nm | 915 nm | 600 nm | 900 nm |
| Service ceiling | 18,000 ft | 18,100 ft | 19,600 ft | 23,000 ft |
| Climb rate | 1,250 ft/min | 924 ft/min | 1,100 ft/min | 679 ft/min |
| Stall speed (Vso) | 63 KCAS | 49 KCAS | 48 KCAS | 49 KCAS |
| Takeoff over 50 ft | — | 1,514 ft | 1,205 ft | — |
| Landing over 50 ft | — | 1,350 ft | 1,365 ft | — |
| Load and fuel | ||||
| Seats | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Useful load | 1,100 lb | 1,090 lb | 1,100 lb | 1,080 lb |
| Full-fuel payload | — | 568 lb | 770 lb | — |
| Max takeoff weight | 3,400 lb | 3,100 lb | 2,650 lb | 2,469 lb |
| Empty weight | 2,300 lb | 2,010 lb | 1,550 lb | 1,389 lb |
| Usable fuel | — | 87 gal | 55 gal | 50 gal |
| Fuel burn at cruise | — | 12.9 gal/h | 12.9 gal/h | 7.4 gal/h |
| Cost of ownership | ||||
| Price, low | — | $240,000 | $110,000 | $227,468 |
| Price, high | — | $880,000 | $255,000 | $255,463 |
| Prices as of | — | 2026 | 2026 | 2022 |
| Engine TBO | — | 2,000 h | 1,500 h | — |
| Overhaul cost, low | — | $46,000 | $40,000 | — |
| Overhaul cost, high | — | $66,000 | $55,000 | — |
| The fleet and its record | ||||
| Registered, all time | 68 | 1,374 | 654 | 20 |
| Active fleet | 31 | 967 | 206 | 20 |
| Median year built | 2005 | 2005 | 1957 | 2025 |
| NTSB events, last 10 years | 5 | 24 | 14 | 0 |
| Fatal events, last 10 years | 2 | 8 | 1 | 0 |
| Events per 1,000 active, last 10 years1 | 161.29 · thin base (low) | 24.82 | 67.96 | 0 · thin base (low) |
| Personal-flying events per 1,000 active2 | 161.29 · thin base (low) | 13.44 | 58.25 | 0 · thin base (low) |
| Ownership transfers, last 24 months | 3 | 186 | 35 | 6 |
| Transfers per 100 active3 | 9.68 · thin base (low) | 19.23 | 16.99 | 30 · thin base (low) |
| Airworthiness directives | 3 | 13 | 6 | 0 |
| Directives, last 5 years | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Rate confidence | low | ok | ok | low |
| Peer scores | ||||
| Peer class | Fixed wing single-engine, piston, 1 engine, 3-4 seats | Fixed wing single-engine, piston, 1 engine, 3-4 seats | Fixed wing single-engine, piston, 1 engine, 3-4 seats | Fixed wing single-engine, piston, 1 engine, 3-4 seats |
| Accident record4 | 0 of 10 · scored on 21 years of events (fewer than 10 in the last 10) | 9.5 of 10 | 1.7 of 10 | — |
| Severity5 | 0.4 of 10 · scored on 21 years of events (fewer than 10 in the last 10) | 1 of 10 | 6.7 of 10 | — |
| Access6 | 1.7 of 10 | 7.3 of 10 | 6 of 10 | — |
| Support7 | 1.4 of 10 | 10 of 10 | 5.9 of 10 | 1.2 of 10 |
| Liquidity8 | 0.3 of 10 | 8.8 of 10 | 2.7 of 10 | 9.3 of 10 |
| Overall (sum of the categories shown)9 | 3.8 out of 50ranks 3 of 3 here | 36.6 out of 50ranks 1 of 3 here | 23 out of 50ranks 2 of 3 here | — |
- Events per 1,000 active, last 10 years: Seawind 3000, per 1,000 active aircraft · base 31 active; Cessna 182T, per 1,000 active aircraft · base 967 active; Cessna 180A, per 1,000 active aircraft · base 206 active; Sling HW, per 1,000 active aircraft · base 20 active.
- Personal-flying events per 1,000 active: Seawind 3000, per 1,000 active aircraft · base 31 active; Cessna 182T, per 1,000 active aircraft · base 967 active; Cessna 180A, per 1,000 active aircraft · base 206 active; Sling HW, per 1,000 active aircraft · base 20 active.
- Transfers per 100 active: Seawind 3000, per 100 active aircraft · base 31 active; Cessna 182T, per 100 active aircraft · base 967 active; Cessna 180A, per 100 active aircraft · base 206 active; Sling HW, per 100 active aircraft · base 20 active.
- Accident record: Seawind 3000, class median 33.21 · 223 models in class; Cessna 182T, class median 33.21 · 223 models in class; Cessna 180A, class median 33.21 · 223 models in class; Sling HW, class median 33.21 · 223 models in class.
- Severity: Seawind 3000, class median 12.5; Cessna 182T, class median 12.5; Cessna 180A, class median 12.5; Sling HW, class median 12.5.
- Access: Seawind 3000, class median 796; Cessna 182T, class median 796; Cessna 180A, class median 796; Sling HW, class median 796.
- Support: Seawind 3000, class median 131; Cessna 182T, class median 131; Cessna 180A, class median 131; Sling HW, class median 131.
- Liquidity: Seawind 3000, class median 19.89; Cessna 182T, class median 19.89; Cessna 180A, class median 19.89; Sling HW, class median 19.89.
- Each of the five categories places the model within its peer class, from 0 (the worst of the class) to 10 (the best): a position among comparable models, not a grade. The overall score is the sum of the categories shown that are scored, out of 10 for each (50 when all five are); it is given only when at least 4 of the five are scored, and it can be set against another model's only when both are in the same peer class and scored on the same categories. When accident record and severity cannot be scored because the model has too few records, the other three give a partial score out of 30, labelled as such; it is never set against a full score.